Is Indian Secularism A Privilege Only For Certain Communities?

State governments own and control the management of Temples and control and operate their assets, take their money, and even have major say in events like Puja and other rituals. At the same time, Mosques and Churches, in India, are owned and operated by the respective religious organizations. The governments do not charge them anything, instead they provide them monetary support and other benefits as well.

“In 2002, from 2 lakh temples in Karnataka, the government collected Rs. 72 crores but returned merely Rs. 10 crores for repair and maintenance. On the Other hand, it granted Rs. 50 crores for the Madrasas and Rs. 10 crores for the churches”.

Notably, India still follows age old laws which were made by Britishers. One such Act is the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Act which was created in 19th century to control and regulate Hindu temples. 

Even after Independence, politicians concocted this anti-secular law to “Provincialize the administration of Hindu Religious Institutions.” 

Under it, the state governments have taken over thousands of temples. This has in effect allowed loot of temple wealth and resources of temples by state governments over decades. 

States not only collect taxes, manage assets, impose State control in temples, but they also often appoint non-Hindus, or even anti-Hindu, bureaucrats, or politicians over Hindu temples. This has led to deterioration of many ancient temples. 

“A UNESCO report in 2017 cautioned that Tamil Nadu government, which manages around 30 thousand temples, neither has the capacity nor qualified experts to carry out conservation, leading to massacre of ancient temples.” (Source: TOI)

Not only are these laws hurt religious sentiments of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, but they also violate Article 14, 15, and 26 and go against the basic structure of the Constitution of India. Article 26 gives a natural right to all communities to manage their institutions, but Hindus, Jains, Sikhs, and Buddhists have been denied this privilege. 

We need to ask ourselves, what kind of a democracy we live in? More importantly we must ask the government, why does it wear the secularism cloak when asking for votes and then discriminate between communities.  
“Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs have similar rights to own, acquire, administer movable-immovable properties of their religious places like Muslims and Christians and State cannot abridge it.” – That exactly states  in the PIL recently filed in SC. 

As the plea states, it is thus necessary that the Centre drafts a Common Charter for Religious and Charitable Institutions and Uniform Code for Religious-Charitable Endowments to ensure that all religious institutions are treated equally, and that they are regulated properly so that the culture and history of this great land can be preserved. 

Moreover Madras HC recently pronounced judgement that temple lands shall always remain with temples; public purpose theory shall not be invoked over temple lands.